Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 11:25:15 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/lib/libcrypto Makefile Message-ID: <20030202172515.GB35774@opus.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <200302021719.h12HJMaX048710@grimreaper.grondar.org> References: <20030202144859.GA38304@sunbay.com> <200302021719.h12HJMaX048710@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 05:19:22PM +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov writes: > > > /usr/share/man/openssl sounds like better place for this. > > > Am I wrong? > > > > > You are. /usr/share/man should contain only man?, cat?, and > > locale subdirectories. This would also be in contrary with > > /usr/share/perl/man and /usr/X11R6/man (we do not offer > > /usr/share/man/perl and /usr/share/man/X11R6). > > OpenSSL (the project) are planning on having man.1ssl, man.3ssl > etc. I think we should fall in with them when they do this. I don't believe the plans are that solid. There has just been one short thread about the possibility. <URL: http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&th=f7fadb4b91a7a22e&seekm=b19bvh%24103p%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw&frame=off > Personally I'd rather not create new man sections just for OpenSSL. I'd rather have them in a separate directory ---- even if the OpenSSL project does decide to use separate man sections. The one thing I am strongly against is a prefix (e.g. `openssl_') for these man pages. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine <nectar@celabo.org> http://www.celabo.org/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030202172515.GB35774>