From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 2 18:26:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318B2106568B for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:26:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE81B8FC14 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:26:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (zoraida.natserv.net [66.114.65.147]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE83F1704F; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:26:23 -0400 (EDT) References: <3bbf2fe10909290811p6ac49f7fxaf7e7d4bf631da4c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: =?ISO-8859-1?B?R3k/cmd5?= Vilmos Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:26:23 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Attilio Rao , freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance evaluation of PostgreSQL's historic releases X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:26:25 -0000 György Vilmos writes: > BTW, even on one thread, Linux (2.6.31) performs much better, better means > here 790 TPS vs. 580... What test did you use to meassure TPS? That is a pretty big difference.