Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 20:40:32 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fix for undefined "__error" and discussion of shared object versioning Message-ID: <19980526204032.01510@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <199805261749.MAA20256@dyson.iquest.net>; from John S. Dyson on Tue, May 26, 1998 at 12:49:52PM -0500 References: <19980526194334.44185@follo.net> <199805261749.MAA20256@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 26, 1998 at 12:49:52PM -0500, John S. Dyson wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 1998 at 11:59:52AM -0500, John S. Dyson wrote: > > > I really don't think that we would want to also get into compiler > > > support issues. Tool support issues are complex enough. I can imagine > > > that egcs (could) be stable enough for our c++ compiler, but am much > > > less confident of it being our default c compiler. > > > > Personally I'd prefer to use TenDRA if at all possible. It seems to > > be much better than GCC when you look at error control etc. > > > > Besides, it has the license we've got as a goal to have overall (ie, a > > BSD-style license :-) > > > Interesting idea... I wonder how good it's code generation is (what is > the cost of using it, performance wise???) If it isn't very slow, it > might be a more reliable alternative. I don't know how fast the compiled code is - from looking at what optimizations the compiler does, it looks like it should be as fast as or faster than GCC. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980526204032.01510>