Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 3 Dec 2007 14:14:53 -0500
From:      Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
To:        FreeBSD Stable List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: IPSEC + Via Padlock + racoon + Windows
Message-ID:  <9BAF9640-1830-4622-886C-9FD08B871FDB@khera.org>
In-Reply-To: <47541532.7010300@jellydonut.org>
References:  <45B7689C.2060209@vwsoft.com> <023801c83548$aac34320$0205000a@white> <47541532.7010300@jellydonut.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Dec 3, 2007, at 9:39 AM, Michael Proto wrote:

> Not that this solves your problem, but doesn't the padlock crypto  
> engine
> only provide acceleration for AES symmetric encryption? From the man  
> page:

The boot messages on my C7 based system shows this:

PadLock: HW support loaded for AES-CBC,SHA1,SHA256.

the CPU is identified like this, so I'm not sure what exactly is  
supported:

CPU: VIA C7 Esther+RNG+AES+AES-CTR+SHA1+SHA256+RSA





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9BAF9640-1830-4622-886C-9FD08B871FDB>