Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 2 Jul 2014 10:31:04 +0200
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Koichiro IWAO <meta@vmeta.jp>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: archivers/rpm build problem
Message-ID:  <20140702083103.GJ7307@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <00000146f62c7bb6-13a698a3-9a41-4a29-98af-fe57c95b3325-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
References:  <20140701123008.GA77747@in-addr.com> <20140702062550.GI7307@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <00000146f62c7bb6-13a698a3-9a41-4a29-98af-fe57c95b3325-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

--Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 08:24:08AM +0000, Koichiro IWAO wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 08:25:50AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > I can confirm the problem and will see if I can fix, I was wondering wh=
y do you
> > or other people use rpm for? I am planning to remove archivers/rpm and
> > recommanding using archivers/rpm4 instead, so I need to need any corner=
 case
> > where rpm4 cannot do rpm3 job.
> >=20
> > btw the linux ports now directly use plain bsdtar :)
>=20
> Can't argue with migrating rpm from 3 to 4.
> At least I still use rpm. Not for extracting rpms but evaluating
> rpm macros like 'rpm --eval %_bindir'.
>=20

Then you might be happy to have rpm4 because rpm4 is what is mostly used to
package/create rpms out there :)

regards,
Bapt

--Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlOzw0cACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzTSQCgvexpGXS7YVpKdV6Q5T9gluAS
a6wAn33TvDFbEryH862Khtmamps1kAva
=Lmuq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140702083103.GJ7307>