From owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 27 16:25:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10F137B401 for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arthur.nitro.dk (port324.ds1-khk.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.113.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307D143FBF for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:25:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from simon@arthur.nitro.dk) Received: by arthur.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4BD5E10BF86; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 01:25:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 01:25:23 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: Marco Wertejuk Message-ID: <20030427232522.GC400@nitro.dk> References: <20030427231103.GA27413@maeko> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+g7M9IMkV8truYOl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030427231103.GA27413@maeko> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: current smp on primergy p200 / i386/39234 X-BeenThere: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD SMP implementation group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 23:25:26 -0000 --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2003.04.28 01:11:03 +0200, Marco Wertejuk wrote: > I was installing Current on a Fujitsu Siemens Primergy P200 > running a SMP configuration and I need the same patch as=20 > described in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Di386/39234 >=20 > After patching the mp_machdep.c the system works fine, > but I don't see the point, why this always has to be > patched manually. >=20 > Is there a reason, why this haven't already been commited? Because it is only valid for the particular motherboard used in the FSC P200/C200 and would most likely break SMP for other motherboards. A "valid" patch would detect the problem (the hang) and the hack the APIC I/O ints table only in this case. This is my understanding of the issue anyway. I don't know enough about the FreeBSD kernel yet to do a proper patch. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+rGbi8kocFXgPTRwRAn9rAJ94dyxeSLmm+Os+Tx7YXLnj8r7iPwCgsF7R YnuqF4w0hcgaRD7UBVD8l7o= =ukgm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl--