From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jul 29 22:43:41 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id WAA18953 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 29 Jul 1995 22:43:41 -0700 Received: from distortion.eng.umd.edu (distortion.eng.umd.edu [129.2.98.6]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA18945 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 1995 22:43:39 -0700 Received: from latte.eng.umd.edu (latte.eng.umd.edu [129.2.98.15]) by distortion.eng.umd.edu (8.6.10/8.6.4) with ESMTP id BAA17419; Sun, 30 Jul 1995 01:38:34 -0400 Received: (chuckr@localhost) by latte.eng.umd.edu (8.6.10/8.6.4) id BAA14320; Sun, 30 Jul 1995 01:38:34 -0400 Date: Sun, 30 Jul 1995 01:38:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Chuck Robey To: Satoshi Asami cc: taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Tcl 7.4 / Tk 4.0 Ports In-Reply-To: <199507292224.PAA07250@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 29 Jul 1995, Satoshi Asami wrote: > Someone please answer this with authority, why is it so hard to get an > answer to a simple question? ;) I have tried, and the new tcl broke things that worked beforehand. I have read (in many places) that they are not compatible. But, I guess I'm really not an authority. ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@eng.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 9120 Edmonston Ct #302 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run Journey2 (Freebsd 2.0R) and n3lxx (301) 220-2114 | (FreeBSD 2.0.5-snap) and am I happy! ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------