From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 1 14:52:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B2C106566B for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:52:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8521E8FC1D for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:52:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 01 Mar 2009 09:52:46 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.4-GA) with ESMTP id POG65669; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 09:52:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 01 Mar 2009 09:52:01 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18858.41232.35075.455290@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 09:52:00 -0500 To: Valerio Daelli In-Reply-To: <27dbfc8c0903010603g32e1640fo49f8c55f652a28d9@mail.gmail.com> References: <27dbfc8c0903010603g32e1640fo49f8c55f652a28d9@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: User Questions Subject: Port of perl 5.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:52:47 -0000 Valerio Daelli writes: > is there anyone working on a port of perl5.10? > I can only see ports of 5.8 and 5.6. > I can make a port of 5.10, it seems to compile flawlessly on > FreeBSD 7. _Many_ ports depend on perl, and each must be tested (and if broken hopefully fixed) before such an ungrade happens. I believe the recent jump from 5.8.8 to 5.8.9 took weeks of behind-the-scenes work. Now imagine what moving to 5.10 will likely involve .... Experienced help is always appreciated, and I commend the 20090113 entry of ports/UPDATING as having a contact point. Robert Huff