Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 8 Jun 2004 15:13:47 +1000
From:      John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>
To:        Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
Cc:        Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
Subject:   Re: weak implementation of threads has problems - kse fix attached
Message-ID:  <20040608051347.GA3604@freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <20040608044844.GA89198@dan.emsphone.com>
References:  <1086663455.1258.79.camel@server.mcneil.com> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10406080028070.11500-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <20040608044844.GA89198@dan.emsphone.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ cross-post lists cut back, ports added 8-) ]

On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 11:48:45PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> A good addition to bsd.port.mk, right next to the "possible network
> server" etc checks, might be to run ldd on all installed shared
> libraries and print a warning if any threads libraries show up.  There
> are a huge number of ports that install shlibs linked to libpthreads.

Good idea.

-- 
John Birrell



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040608051347.GA3604>