Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:24:48 -0500
From:      Jerry <>
To:        FreeBSD <>
Subject:   Re: OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??
Message-ID:  <20110207142448.51007694@scorpio>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <> <> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 11:12:45 -0800
David Brodbeck <> articulated:

> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Bill Moran <>
> wrote:
> > Also, I'm having trouble understanding how people like that get
> > grants to do work like that.  On the one hand, they obviously know
> > enough about cryptography to make improvements.  On the other hand,
> > they can't seem to get a grip on the fact that the code will need
> > to have a license before anyone can grab it and incorporate it.  I
> > can't find anywhere on that page where it tells me what terms I am
> > allowed to use those patches under.
> This seems to be a big problem with academia in general.  I almost
> never see a piece of code associated with a research paper that has a
> coherent license attached to it.  Often there's no license at all.  I
> don't know if this is ignorance or if there are bureaucratic hurdles
> at work here.  It's possible it's the latter, since universities often
> want to profit off of licensing the research that's done on their
> sites.

A university or any business for that matter certainly has the right to
profit from any research or other work done on a given project if such
research or work were done using the university's or business's

Jerry ✌

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
If you think things can't get worse it's probably only because you
lack sufficient imagination.

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>