Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 24 Mar 2002 17:47:47 +0100
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: turning off malloc's AJ by default 
Message-ID:  <62336.1016988467@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 24 Mar 2002 11:28:27 EST." <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020324112220.47668e-100000@fledge.watson.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020324112220.47668e-100000@fledge.watson.org>, Robe
rt Watson writes:

>With new userland code coming into -CURRENT at a rapid rate, it may be
>useful in -CURRENT for developers.  For DPs, probably not.

I don't have to tell you what the 'D' in 'DP' means, right ?  :-)

Robert, I can only say that I disagree 100% with you.

In principle because I think only -RELEASE should not have J, and
I think even -RELEASE should have A.

In practice I think this is completely l00ney, considering what
we have done in the kernel, worrying about AJ related false hits
is sooo totally down in the noise.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?62336.1016988467>