From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 1 02:06:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9581065673 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 02:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862AC8FC19 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 02:06:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j2so4221797tid.3 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:06:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=U8hAxqSkA/r0eYgM9kSXW0H8ommH9Q/QhWX+Ay/HhQM=; b=vsVpnzvq1Lz6VZm8DZ1vnTKB4AxaglpQz4kUq29FaE28BeqDcO8qYxs7zsp0o3ha6nq+1ApP+TQQqbCNb6xEG8UC3ng5ttcSMQ9LbAVnRx5NW3tG8RjBmxipYW3zXfOl+/X2Kzl1qmOmiy+WyUcx3RdqFmD6clkrjVPZ2a/GzHU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=nLQ4QqoRWXRSebyQTM3P3CmEIFEKNhzi6QP1MG18CR4WWZLve+Be8efqU8smSfM30a3P1BPOHZM0cy8fap6p1ffXZJAbnfYbJTzeK8hU2rOwW9GkSDBUuvBMNkdYmzqLPl/qVrMXWxIKprJTZgyH2ZoYF2fT9cLitDMEI/eznVU= Received: by 10.151.146.18 with SMTP id y18mr3624096ybn.3.1204337189951; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:06:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.144.2 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:06:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 11:06:29 +0900 From: "Adrian Chadd" Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com To: Chris In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0802290854t639559b6if0adc4009997e9db@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47C59591.6040600@errno.com> <3aaaa3a0802290744x25a81d68vf0ff101f6b7a819e@mail.gmail.com> <1204302128.2126.150.camel@localhost> <3aaaa3a0802290854t639559b6if0adc4009997e9db@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0bcabb9655f30f33 Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 02:06:34 -0000 On 01/03/2008, Chris wrote: > You working round what I just said. A nic should perform equally well > as it does in other operating systems just because its cheaper its not > an excuse for buggy performance. There is also other good network > cards apart from intel pro 1000. I am talking about stability not > performance, I expect a intel pro 1000 to outperform a realtek however > I expect both to be stable in terms of connectivity. I expect a > realtek in freebsd to perform as well as a realtek in windows and > linux. :) Patches please! Adrian -- Adrian Chadd - adrian@freebsd.org