Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:18:52 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: vman@tmok.com Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/64415: make in ports stopped by ASCII GUI Message-ID: <4059CBEC.7040405@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20040318160038.GA674@k2.homeunix.net> References: <4059B9E9.80802@fillmore-labs.com> <20040318150738.GA87118@k2.homeunix.net> <4059BD4E.7040803@fillmore-labs.com> <20040318152648.GA91776@k2.homeunix.net> <4059C4E1.5050009@fillmore-labs.com> <20040318160038.GA674@k2.homeunix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vlad Manilici wrote: > Hi Oliver, > >> "PR 64233 will use default options when build with BATCH=yes." >>Does this solve your problem? > >>There is interest. PR 63682 does use default options (always) when >>PACKAGE_BUILDING is set. PR 64233 uses saved options, but defaults >>to the default configuration without popping up a preferences dialog >>when BATCH is set. > > Sorry, it seems either of us does not get the point. I would like to > have the ports build without GUI options selection *by default*. That > means, when setting *nothing*, as the average user does. I got the point. In fact, son-of-PR 64233 has a variable (DISABLE_CONFIG, I'm not exactly sure), which you can set in /etc/make.conf when you want default options by default. > Definitely, you have shown me a valid way invalidate option selection. Ehm, sorry? > Now, of course I do not know if there is interest in the above default > behaviour. Try it. Post a patch. > Did I make myself clear sofar? Sofar, sogood. I guess it would be much clearer if we had a prototype patch to see clearly what you have in mind. Be aware though, that OPTIONS handling is not as easy as it seems. -Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4059CBEC.7040405>