From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 24 19:42:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED311065670; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 19:42:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mavbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DC78FC29; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 19:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm13 with SMTP id 13so6072305fxm.13 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:42:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7BsRxhunQXzGvaCj9Be0CN5MoRYrsB5zWmY5nehlBNI=; b=HsaP0g0/e80jI7hfnbH9PRhJUMssIizUpzs2EEWRLNMA4XjK32cHp8EpmDYi54hetd QLx+cOq6h9a8brM8yVvNRU1m8h3GwaRUtWYfD7+NJzmu8omrafibBwHGcXQql39OHXxT mDA4Fx9uIZOGa8Krl6VWdiYMgT5J4/kxILpXs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=C7NpeNXQXKmQFXL95mFewk7J0IuNyzppfC3rpTiT1AdmObDV61J+oMtQyMeHwwFbA1 b8kcwXdBMfwtlGDZjSQTqRXKz9wCkrPqwoObOe5hq30qw1OHv42gyLctR27ZKiFzpGMG 5MULKFLeC9iTjjunYvsNTRxxyjPxC4xETl7LI= Received: by 10.223.125.196 with SMTP id z4mr4619097far.80.1280000566158; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:42:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mavbook.mavhome.dp.ua (pc.mavhome.dp.ua [212.86.226.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r10sm628317faq.29.2010.07.24.12.42.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:42:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Alexander Motin Message-ID: <4C4B4231.80406@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:42:41 +0300 From: Alexander Motin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100402) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <201007241049.o6OAnxvo001874@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r210444 - head/sys/x86/x86 X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 19:42:49 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Alexander Motin wrote: >> Author: mav >> Date: Sat Jul 24 10:49:59 2010 >> New Revision: 210444 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/210444 >> >> Log: >> Increment td->td_intr_nesting_level for LAPIC timer interrupts. Among >> other >> things it hints SCHED_ULE to run clock swi handlers on their native >> CPUs, >> avoiding many unneeded IPI_PREEMPT calls. > > Will this help SCHED_4BSD at all? I'm finding it to be slightly better > for interactivity on a loaded system, but frankly at this point they > both leave a lot to be desired. At least not directly. SCHED_4BSD doesn't use this variable. But I have no idea if the problem exist there. Even on SCHED_ULE it happens only in some cases, if swi thread was accidentally pushed out of it's CPU by higher priority thread. 4BSD has different migration logic, so behavior could be different there. -- Alexander Motin