Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:56:34 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang Message-ID: <201206222256.q5MMuYom043974@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: <CB.60.12873.46F24EF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Thomas Mueller" wrote: > > > There actually is/was a closed-source BSD (BSDI), and there is Mac OS X, with BSD under the covers. BSDi sold source-code licenses. I was an early-adopter, and I _have_ one. The vast majority of the code was taken directly from BSD 4.4 Lite, and the source-code carried just the UCB copyriht and licensinG, The 'missing pieces' necessary to make an 'operational' O/S were copyright BSDi, most had fairly liberal license terms. There were some _vendor_supplied drivers that were binary-only, and had more rstrictive licensing.`
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201206222256.q5MMuYom043974>