From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar  2 21:02:30 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AB0106566B
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  2 Mar 2009 21:02:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de)
Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net
	[78.111.72.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66BCB8FC13
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  2 Mar 2009 21:02:28 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de)
Received: (qmail 44974 invoked by uid 89); 2 Mar 2009 21:02:28 -0000
Message-ID: <20090302210228.44973.qmail@avocado.salatschuessel.net>
References: <20090302163843.cc66c55e.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0903021100190.59723@qbhto.arg>
	<20090302202520.eaf09b15.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
	<49AC3D3C.8040106@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <49AC3D3C.8040106@FreeBSD.org>
From: "Oliver Lehmann" <oliver@FreeBSD.org>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:02:28 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, dan@langille.org
Subject: Re: restart a script in etc/rc.d
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:02:30 -0000

Doug Barton writes: 

> You missed the bit where I said that this should come after the
> assignment of the defaults below.

Ok, but... 

> Have you confirmed that the two pid files exist, and that they contain
> the right information?

Yes they both exists (probably because I define the variable in rc.conf
too). See my initial mail where I cat the contents of both files - they
both contain the right PID for their specific process. 

So - where is the problem now?