Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:16:04 +0300
From:      Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Justin Hibbits <jhibbits@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r353296 - head/sys/powerpc/include
Message-ID:  <20191008081604.GZ44691@kib.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <201910080136.x981aYTq073145@repo.freebsd.org>
References:  <201910080136.x981aYTq073145@repo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 01:36:34AM +0000, Justin Hibbits wrote:
> Author: jhibbits
> Date: Tue Oct  8 01:36:34 2019
> New Revision: 353296
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/353296
> 
> Log:
>   powerpc: Implement atomic_(f)cmpset_ for short and char
>   |
>   This adds two implementations for each atomic_fcmpset_ and atomic_cmpset_
>   short and char functions, selectable at compile time for the target
>   architecture.  By default, it uses a generic shift-and-mask to perform atomic
>   updates to sub-components of 32-bit words from <sys/_atomic_subword.h>.
>   However, if ISA_206_ATOMICS is defined it uses the ll/sc instructions for
>   halfword and bytes, introduced in PowerISA 2.06.  These instructions are
>   supported by all IBM processors from POWER7 on, as well as the Freescale/NXP
>   e6500 core.  Although the e5500 and e500mc both implement PowerISA 2.06 they
>   do not implement these instructions.
>   
>   As part of this, clean up the atomic_(f)cmpset_acq and _rel wrappers, by
>   using macros to reduce code duplication.
>   
>   ISA_206_ATOMICS requires clang or newer binutils (2.20 or later).
Why don't you use normal word-sized ll/sc tlwarx/stwcx, and only modifying
the part of the register as needed ?  This would work on all supported
CPUs, right ?

When kevans did the _atomic_subword.h, one of the arches involved was
sparc64, which does not have ll/sc.  Also for MIPS there are some fine
details which might mean that C implementation is less work than using
word-sized ll/sc.  But why for power ?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20191008081604.GZ44691>