Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 10 Jul 1999 13:54:24 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Steve Hovey <shovey@buffnet.net>
To:        Mark Thomas <thomas@clark.net>
Cc:        Don Croyle <croyle@gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 4.0?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907101354000.2273-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net>
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19990710135451.00971100@pop3.clark.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Well it seems no matter what the freeBSD focus on THEY KICK BUTT! :)

On Sat, 10 Jul 1999, Mark Thomas wrote:

> At 01:38 PM 7/10/99 -0400, Steve Hovey wrote:
> >
> >
> >On 10 Jul 1999, Don Croyle wrote:
> >
> >> Steve Hovey <shovey@buffnet.net> writes:
> >> 
> >> > out of curiousity, whats new about 4 that caused the jump in numbering
> >> > from 3.X?
> >> 
> >> Initially, nothing.  Now, quite a bit.
> >> 
> >> Once the development tree was fairly stable 3 was branched off from
> >> it.  3.x releases are mainly bug fixes and drop in updates, the basic
> >> feature set is frozen.  The development branch, with its number bumped
> >
> >I thought 3 was 3 because of dual processor support stuff.
> 
> Not to mention AOUT => ELF.
> 
> 
> Mark
> ---
> thomas@clark.net ---> http://www.clark.net/pub/thomas
> PBEM Eldritch --------> http://www.pmpro.com/eldritch
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9907101354000.2273-100000>