From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 24 00:25:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D21D16A4CE for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 00:25:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao08.cox.net (lakermmtao08.cox.net [68.230.240.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EB743D45 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 00:25:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from dolphin.local.net ([68.11.71.51]) by lakermmtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709) with ESMTP id <20040724002529.KVKL3428.lakermmtao08.cox.net@dolphin.local.net>; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 20:25:29 -0400 Received: from dolphin.local.net (localhost.local.net [127.0.0.1]) by dolphin.local.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6O0PSJ0064993; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 19:25:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@dolphin.local.net) Received: (from conrads@localhost) by dolphin.local.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6O0PScB064992; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 19:25:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.5 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1090628010.2748.78.camel@leguin> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 19:25:28 -0500 (CDT) Organization: A Rag-Tag Band of Drug-Crazed Hippies From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: Eric Anholt cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: X.Org conversion X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: conrads@cox.net List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 00:25:30 -0000 On 24-Jul-2004 Eric Anholt wrote: > On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 17:07, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: >> >> Just one question: have the inconsistencies been worked out in >> translating XFree86 fonts package dependencies to Xorg fonts >> packages? Have all ports that depend on XFree86 fonts packages >> been adjusted, and if so, how was this issue resolved? > > Yes, it was dealt with by making those ports point at the font > package that provides truetype fonts. OK, but then what about the dependencies on Type1 fonts? Those have all just been dropped? Might it not be better to ensure that both packages are listed now as dependencies? -- Conrad J. Sabatier -- "In Unix veritas"