From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 8 04:48:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF95416A4D5; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 04:48:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A3243D45; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 04:48:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i584mjND047596; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:48:45 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:48:45 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Daniel Eischen Message-ID: <20040608044844.GA89198@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1086663455.1258.79.camel@server.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Sean McNeil cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: weak implementation of threads has problems - kse fix attached X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 04:48:46 -0000 In the last episode (Jun 08), Daniel Eischen said: > No, I don't want to litter all our thread libraries with strong > references. As I've said before, build your shared libraries > correctly so they don't bring in the threads library. A good addition to bsd.port.mk, right next to the "possible network server" etc checks, might be to run ldd on all installed shared libraries and print a warning if any threads libraries show up. There are a huge number of ports that install shlibs linked to libpthreads. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com