From owner-cvs-all Sun Sep 26 21:29:49 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@hub.freebsd.org Received: from november.jaded.net (november.jaded.net [216.94.113.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB99D14F54; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 21:29:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@november.jaded.net) Received: (from dan@localhost) by november.jaded.net (8.9.3/8.9.3+trinsec_nospam) id AAA26342; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 00:48:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 00:48:20 -0400 From: Dan Moschuk To: Chris Costello Cc: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami , cvs-committers@hub.FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@hub.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/misc/sshbuddy - Imported sources Message-ID: <19990927004732.A26254@november.jaded.net> References: <199909262312.QAA24488@freefall.freebsd.org> <19990926205132.O76486@holly.calldei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <19990926205132.O76486@holly.calldei.com>; from Chris Costello on Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 08:51:32PM -0500 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk | > Given that this one is a utility to use ssh, wouldn't "security" be a | > more suitable place? | | The nature of it is quite the reverse of security. :) I'd have to agree. The reason I put the port under misc as opposed to security is that it isn't really a utility that relates to system security. It's a simple program to spawn xterm -e 'ssh host'; one could argue this program (with the option of saving passwords I believe) can reduce the amount of "security" on the machine (once your comprimised, so is everything else) ... If you disagree, I will move it. You're the PW. :-) Cheers! -- Dan Moschuk (TFreak!dan@freebsd.org) "Try not. Do, or do not. There is no try." -- Yoda To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message