Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:41:20 +0000 (UTC) From: Kostya Berger <bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk> To: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: release name Message-ID: <1647344805.12798604.1469990480731.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1647344805.12798604.1469990480731.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Could somebody, please, explain this: Am I right to assume that CURRENT or "head" release number is now 12.0?For in that case I'll have to reduild the ports in case of upgrading my system to the current head, right?Because my current system was build well before the 11.0-alpfha releases statred appearing. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Jul 31 18:43:26 2016 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601D7BAA251 for <freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:43:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2790E173E for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:43:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>) id 1bTvhv-000HtU-Hd; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:43:27 +0200 Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:43:27 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Kostya Berger <bergerkos@yahoo.co.uk> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: release name Message-ID: <20160731184327.GI96200@home.opsec.eu> References: <1647344805.12798604.1469990480731.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1647344805.12798604.1469990480731.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1647344805.12798604.1469990480731.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current <freebsd-current.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:43:26 -0000 Hi! > Could somebody, please, explain this: > Am I right to assume that CURRENT or "head" release number is now > 12.0? Yes. > For in that case I'll have to reduild the ports in case of > upgrading my system to the current head, right? Because my current > system was build well before the 11.0-alpha releases statred > appearing. If you build them on 11.0-alpha, they are good enough. You only need to rebuild those that no longer work. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1647344805.12798604.1469990480731.JavaMail.yahoo>