Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:10:13 -0500 From: "Halber Mensch" <shocker@ionet.net> To: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: yet another network monkey Message-ID: <000801bfa5cf$b6f84340$9c6d0418@okcne1.ok.home.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BFA5A5.CDE83F80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm trying to do something nearly impossible.. my TCP/IP knowledge is = way too slim for this. here's the situation... bsd box with two nics... one pointing to static cable address, one to = 192.168.0.1 LAN address I'm trying to get a local LAN working on the 192.168.0.xxx and have it = all route through the BSD box.. I've enabled the router daemon and by = some freak chance I got the BSD box to route out... I could never get = the LAN to communicate. .. to say nothing about having it route through = the BSD box... and here's something else wierd.. I managed to gnarl up the config = somehow... the two NICs are setup with the proper addies, and the = routing table appears to direct the routing correctly... but when I try = to ping out to the cable router I can see the packets go out and return, = but the packets lost somewhere. I think my config is just all hosed now. = If anyone has done anything similar I would appreciate some advice.. = also.. do I need to be setting the machine up as just a router or as a = gateway as well? and what system should be the default router? ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BFA5A5.CDE83F80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2722.2800" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm trying to do something nearly = impossible.. my=20 TCP/IP knowledge is way too slim for this.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>here's the situation...</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>bsd box with two nics... one pointing = to static=20 cable address, one to 192.168.0.1 LAN address</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm trying to get a local LAN working = on the=20 192.168.0.xxx and have it all route through the BSD box.. I've enabled = the=20 router daemon and by some freak chance I got the BSD box to route out... = I could=20 never get the LAN to communicate. .. to say nothing about having it = route=20 through the BSD box...</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>and here's something else wierd.. I = managed to=20 gnarl up the config somehow... the two NICs are setup with the proper = addies,=20 and the routing table appears to direct the routing correctly... but = when I try=20 to ping out to the cable router I can see the packets go out and return, = but the=20 packets lost somewhere. I think my config is just all hosed now. If = anyone has=20 done anything similar I would appreciate some advice.. also.. do I need = to be=20 setting the machine up as just a router or as a gateway as well? and = what system=20 should be the default router?</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BFA5A5.CDE83F80-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000801bfa5cf$b6f84340$9c6d0418>