From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 10:14:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2966A16A4CE; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 10:14:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from blues.jpj.net (blues.jpj.net [208.210.80.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19A243D3F; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 10:14:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from blues.jpj.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blues.jpj.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i2LIEthV071130; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 13:14:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from localhost (trevor@localhost)i2LIEtGW071127; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 13:14:55 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: blues.jpj.net: trevor owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 13:14:55 -0500 (EST) From: Trevor Johnson To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040321125347.U93457@blues.jpj.net> References: <200403201452.i2KEqJ9b039309@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040321042730.V93457@blues.jpj.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 cc: trevor@FreeBSD.org cc: Alexander Leidinger cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/lame Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:14:16 -0000 Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote: > Trevor Johnson writes: > > BTW if we were shielded from patent lawsuits we could distribute > > bzip-compressed packages and save a fair bit of space (see > > ports/archivers/bzip). > > Umm, why? We already use bzip2, which provides better compression > than bzip and is unencumbered. I'm not sure what you mean by "better compression", but as I said, bzip produces smaller output: 839680 calgary-corpus-bzip.tar 849920 calgary-corpus-bzip2.tar 542720 canterbury-corpus-bzip.tar 552960 canterbury-corpus-bzip2.tar 2570240 large-canterbury-corpus-bzip.tar 2590720 large-canterbury-corpus-bzip2.tar 3000320 protein-corpus-bzip.tar 3010560 protein-corpus-bzip2.tar I agree that bzip2 is better though. :) -- Trevor Johnson