Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 13:21:43 -0700 (PDT) From: "Thomas Mueller" <mueller6724@bellsouth.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: print/cups new 1.7.3 fails on undefined references in http.c Message-ID: <135289.82092.bm@smtp115.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <303976.56953.bm@smtp120.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <53B4561B.703@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
from Matthias Andree: > It is compiled as though it should use GNUTLS, but links against OPENSSL > (-lssl -lcrypto) - the port maintainer might want to look into this; > until then, flip the options to use OPENSSL, then it might work. There is no port maintainer (ports@FreeBSD.org). I could possibly wait and see if there is an update/correction? It's much easier with NetBSD pkgsrc or Gentoo (Linux) to see what port options have been defined or modified by user. User-specified options are in /etc/mk.conf or /etc/make.conf, like .ifdef BSD_PKG_MK # begin pkgsrc settings PACKAGES= /usr/packages PKG_DEVELOPER=YES X11_TYPE=modular PKG_DEFAULT_OPTIONS+= ssl inet6 nls ncurses pcre gtk2 x11 fftw esound cups sndfile png aalib PKG_DBDIR= /var/db/pkg LOCALBASE= /usr/pkg VARBASE= /var PKG_TOOLS_BIN= /usr/pkg/sbin PKGMANDIR= man WRKDIR_BASENAME= work699.amd64 MKMAINTAINERTOOLS=yes WRKOBJDIR= /BETA1/pkgsrc PKGSRCDIR= /BETA1/pkgsrc PKG_OPTIONS.msmtp+= idn PKG_OPTIONS.w3m+= w3m-image-gtk2 PKG_OPTIONS.gcc-aux+= testsuite PKG_OPTIONS.mutt+= idn mutt-smtp -ncurses ncursesw PKG_OPTIONS.avahi+= introspection PKG_OPTIONS.fftw+= fftw-fortran PKG_OPTIONS.boost+= icu PKG_OPTIONS.sane-backends+= snmp # PKG_OPTIONS.lynx+= ncurses ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES+= socks5-license ALLOW_VULNERABLE_PACKAGES=yes DEPENDS_TARGET=package-install UPDATE_TARGET=package-install SKIP_LICENSE_CHECK= yes .endif # end pkgsrc settings Can something like this be done in FreeBSD with ports, instead of dialog? It seems there have been some changes recently, would the Porter's Handbook be up-to-date? It is a nuisance when I try to make config again, and get no dialog at all. dialog4ports is a big improvement over the old dialog, but still not as good as being able to see options cleanly in mk.conf (make.conf). Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?135289.82092.bm>