From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 3 10:24:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FD616A47B; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 10:24:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dandee@volny.cz) Received: from pipa.vshosting.cz (pipa.vshosting.cz [81.0.201.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0740449F8; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 10:24:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dandee@volny.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pipa.vshosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67BD4E709; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:24:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pipa.vshosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pipa [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21858-07; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:24:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gandalf (unknown [81.0.245.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pipa.vshosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758C94E705; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:24:35 +0200 (CEST) From: "Stay d" To: "'Sergey Matveychuk'" Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:24:33 +0200 Message-ID: <000e01c69e8a$e15c5d00$6508280a@tocnet28.jspoj.czf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <44A8D361.7040808@FreeBSD.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-Index: AcaeeZ9zsg2IXxejSGmtuToWivpQjgAEFITw X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at profix.cz Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.1.3.2, 2 - help me please, the port in short time is broken again, what does it all mean ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dandee@volny.cz List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 10:24:38 -0000 You did it, okay, thank you, but late :( I always before upgrading something, go to /usr/ports and watch the UPDATING file, simple there was nothing about portupgrade, nothing at the bigging of June nothing at the end of June or at the bigging of July. I am sorry that I do not read almost everything, but I thought ... I have a idea that UPDATING file is the MAIN place where comments MUST BE. Sorry, this fact the handbook teached me. :) Daniel > -----Original Message----- > From: Sergey Matveychuk [mailto:sem@FreeBSD.org] > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 10:21 AM > To: Hajimu UMEMOTO > Cc: dandee@volny.cz; ports@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.1.3.2, 2 - help me > please, the port in short time is broken again, what does it > all mean ? > > Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > > Hi, > > > >>>>>> On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 10:15:56 +0400 Sergey Matveychuk > >>>>>> said: > > > > sem> See my HANDS-UP message a couples days ago at the list. > > sem> Old (<=2.1.1,2) portupgrade use wrong (may be a right > word will - > > sem> "unexpected") database format. > > > > I don't think that old portupgrade uses wrong database format. You > > changed the default version of Berkeley DB, silently: > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/portupgrade/Makef > > ile.diff?r1=1.224&r2=1.225 > > > > It broke backward compatibility of .db files. > > You should be meant I forgot add an entry to UPDATING? Yes, I > forgot it. > I'll do. > > -- > Dixi. > Sem. >