From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 11 21:50:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9231D10656AB; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:50:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacombar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pv0-f182.google.com (mail-pv0-f182.google.com [74.125.83.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548168FC20; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pvg11 with SMTP id 11so4217296pvg.13 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:50:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TQqBeUi00VHs2aMCPDIIX8zLNzLfkeWV9eN0NUilYXQ=; b=i1PG40KAReIuo3kU9vGDD+w0vKtJRydK++25JCqk9ryRm4JM4mnYr1svmw2RZvt64z a/BN+9idMdeVD0/iIdZdZeMGWxB9C0o7VsZddboyysKE5e1iOPyloJfuJPM5VRrenJlH uWAPS3gF6jq1dhlvnaoTOioeEyx6xlOZJSV4E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.41.34 with SMTP id c2mr7924714pbl.340.1310421044611; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:50:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.49.42 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:50:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110706162811.GA68436@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20110706193636.GA69550@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4E14CCE5.4050906@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110707015151.GB71966@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20110711204049.GA98996@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:50:44 -0400 Message-ID: From: Arnaud Lacombe To: Steve Kargl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:08:22 +0000 Cc: Adrian Chadd , FreeBSD Current , "Hartmann, O." , arrowdodger <6yearold@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:50:45 -0000 Hi, [re-sent publicly, I did not "Replied-to-all":)] On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Steve Kargl > wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:33:44PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >>> >>> For the record, I would like to see enforced public review for _every_ >>> patch *before* it is checked in, as a strong rule. gcc system is >>> particularly interesting. But it is not likely to happen in FreeBSD >>> where FreeBSD committers are clearly more free than other at >>> checking-in un-publicly-reviewed stuff (especially _bad_ stuff). >>> >>> This would of course apply even to long-time committers, no matter how >>> it hurt their ego (which I definitively do not care about). >>> >> >> As a long time GCC committer, I think that you have grossly >> over-simplified the GCC review process and how a submitted >> patch is approved for committing. >> > Yes. > Just to provide information more information than these sterile mails, here is the gcc contribution guidelines: http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html - Arnaud