Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:29:38 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> To: Ganael LAPLANCHE <martymac@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r330484 - in head: . emulators emulators/dolphin-emu emulators/dolphin-emu-devel emulators/dolphin-emu/files Message-ID: <525E4062.70107@passap.ru> In-Reply-To: <201310160716.r9G7GvpJ036930@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201310160716.r9G7GvpJ036930@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
16.10.2013 11:16, Ganael LAPLANCHE пишет: > +.if !empty(ICONV_LIB) Is there a specific reason to use a negate check here? > +CMAKE_ARGS+= -DUSE_ICONV:BOOL=ON > +.else > +CMAKE_ARGS+= -DUSE_ICONV:BOOL=OFF > +.endif That means that the port does not use (need) iconv at 10.x and up systems. Is it really the case? Can the port use native iconv at 10.x and up systems? -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?525E4062.70107>