From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Jan 8 19:54: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9976A1527C; Sat, 8 Jan 2000 19:54:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from workhorse (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA18525; Sat, 8 Jan 2000 20:53:52 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000108205232.01a37b60@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2000 20:53:52 -0700 To: Wes Peters , chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: article on 4.0 Cc: Michael Lucas , advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3877ACA9.9719C8EA@softweyr.com> References: <200001071514.KAA17803@blackhelicopters.org> <38769B00.7A6DE354@softweyr.com> <20000108115749.B47712@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 02:31 PM 1/8/2000 , Wes Peters wrote: >Nik Clayton wrote: > > > > [ FU -chat ] > > > > On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 07:03:44PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > > > > *scads of device drivers (yes, scads *is* a technical term) > > > > > > I believe the correct technical term here would be a "buttload." > > > > Metric buttload or Imperial buttload? > >We've standardized on the ANSI/ISO buttload to avoid confusion, and >conversion errors. That's good. I'd hate to see anyone's butt burned up during re-entry. ;-) --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message