From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Wed Sep 23 16:38:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA9FA064D9 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18B661ED6 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t8NGcLYp096493 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:38:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 198457] zfs acl lost after zfs send-receive. Kernel panic Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:38:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: o.bende@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:38:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198457 --- Comment #4 from o.bende@gmail.com --- Thanks for your Comment. I think the main problem is not the handling of the error, but that there is an error! I can (probably) understand, why the system should panic because of such a file-system issue - but why is there this issue? Summary: Why are the ACLs broken after replication? And another question: Why do you think we should contact ZoL? I always thought, ZoL and FreeBSD ZFS are two different systems?! Actually, I did not choose ZoL because it is not really defined production-ready - but FreeBSD ZFS is. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.