From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 06:40:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A862016A4BF; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:40:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F64343FF9; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:40:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h85DeCTI010307; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 15:40:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: David Gilbert From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 05 Sep 2003 09:23:06 EDT." <16216.36410.889440.499438@canoe.velocet.net> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 15:40:12 +0200 Message-ID: <10306.1062769212@critter.freebsd.dk> cc: Petri Helenius cc: Max Clark cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org cc: Geoff Buckingham cc: Dan Nelson cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 20TB Storage System X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 13:40:30 -0000 In message <16216.36410.889440.499438@canoe.velocet.net>, David Gilbert writes: >That reminds me... has anyone thought of designing the system to have >more than 8 frags per block? Increasingly, for large file >performance, we're pushing up the block size dramatically. This is >with the assumption that large disks will contain large files. > >It strikes me that driving the block size up (as far as 1M) and having >a 256 (or so) fragments might become appropriate. Sounds like a _great_ project for somebody :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.