From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 18:16:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748F237B401 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 18:16:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0673843FBF for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 18:16:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.no-ip.com[66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2003080101162601600ioeb1e>; Fri, 1 Aug 2003 01:16:26 +0000 Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [66.30.200.37] (may be forged)) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h711GIM1047169; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 21:16:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h711GIAV047166; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 21:16:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com To: Aaron Siegel References: <200307300958.52941.aaron-siegel@bresnan.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 31 Jul 2003 21:16:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200307300958.52941.aaron-siegel@bresnan.net> Message-ID: <44adau18kd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd behind a proxy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 01:16:29 -0000 Aaron Siegel writes: > I am currently helping a fellow user, Rommel B. Ikeda r_ikeda@oisca.org. He > is have problems getting is computer to connect to the internet through a > Window 2000 proxy server. I only have experience with NAT. I do not expect > someone to solve our problem just point me to the correct documents (feel > free to solve the problem if you like). Proxies have to be handled on an application-by-application basis. Unlike that abomination of networking called NAT, they need intimate knowledge of the protocols being passed through them.