From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 14 20:02:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901B816A409 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 20:02:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from smtpclu-6.eunet.yu (smtpclu-6.eunet.yu [194.247.192.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A1613C4A8 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 20:02:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from nyx.localhost (adsl-227-182.eunet.yu [213.198.227.182]) by smtpclu-6.eunet.yu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l6EK2OHd011756; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 20:02:27 GMT Message-Id: <200707142002.l6EK2OHd011756@smtpclu-6.eunet.yu> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 22:02:17 +0200 From: Nikola Lecic To: Tek Bahadur Limbu In-Reply-To: <46990985.8020002@wlink.com.np> References: <4697C8DA.60705@wlink.com.np> <200707132345.l6DNjRb2023407@eunet.yu> <46990985.8020002@wlink.com.np> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.10.13; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-EUNET-AVAS-Milter-Version: 2.0.0 X-AVAS-Virus-Status: clean X-AVAS-Spamd-Symbols: BAYES_40,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-AVAS-Spam-Score: -0.2 Cc: Manolis Kiagias , Pollywog , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-6.1 bootup hangs after power failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 20:02:40 -0000 On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:21:05 +0545 Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > One thing I find FreeBSD very fussy and sensitive in comparison to > Linux OSes is that whenever there is an power outage, something wrong > is bound to happen. Maybe, it was made to happen this way but living > in here over the other side of the world, we do have to face power > outages despite our best efforts. My experiences are completely opposite. I find UFS stability and integrity superior to that of ext2/ext3 in cases such as power failures, and UFS background fsck-ing as a fascinating feature. (After power failure, UFS usually needs zero repairs thanks to soft updates.) What other wrong things you experienced? I agree with Manolis that you simply must have been terribly unlucky. Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87