Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:38:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: FreeBSD current mailing list <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: is_sk locking in sk_attach Message-ID: <20040711153746.C76940@carver.gumbysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20040711152739.W76940@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0407102229190.12756@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <20040711152739.W76940@carver.gumbysoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Doug White wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > > there had been some discussion lately about if_sk and attach locking. > > compiled if_sk as module on amd64 and kldloading started a race with > > follwoing output: > > If you have unpatched sk sources, the locking is entirely wrong. You > _will_ get witness warnings. I have a basic patch that gets rid of most > of them, and I think bms is working on a more complete lockdown. I posted > my patch to -current, but I can't guarantee its entirely correct :) Oops, bms isn't working on locking for sk. Please disregard that statement. :) -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040711153746.C76940>