Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 06:29:34 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is the "better / best " method to multi-boot different OSes natively WITHOUT VirtualBox(es) ? Message-ID: <20201027062934.d0bd53b0192c33a18491b636@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20201027071230.0c60b09b@archlinux> References: <CALMiprbGBaSJQUAA=1HDZAjvsVNK7dqB_5mBb5DKzV16F3hxHg@mail.gmail.com> <20201024111010.5c867e8540a369b826d26703@sohara.org> <20201025065025.6a13dc89@archlinux> <20201025173321.8adee3e5.freebsd@edvax.de> <20201026153012.0cf46ec8@gumby.homeunix.com> <10e0134ddb726ac78174a63bd20ec0bdeb3c896d.camel@riseup.net> <20201026180155.48690495@archlinux> <20201026230836.5cd9e0dc@gumby.homeunix.com> <20201027071230.0c60b09b@archlinux>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:12:30 +0100 Ralf Mardorf <ralf-mardorf@riseup.net> wrote: > If multi-boot means that the OP just wants to test a few operating > systems or seldom wants to use different operating systems, than a hot > swap drive bay and/or drives in external enclosures and/or even USB > sticks, SD cards etc. make sense. "Really" often used operating systems > are better a part of desktop PC and aren't treat by a games console > cartridge approach. If the OS is really often used then it would probably make more sense, and be far more convenient, to have it available in a VM than to multi-boot. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20201027062934.d0bd53b0192c33a18491b636>