Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:15:39 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Cc: Thomas Dickey <dickey@radix.net> Subject: Re: Suggest to upgrade some software in base Message-ID: <200406271815.42697.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20040627154009.GA23021@saltmine.radix.net> References: <20040627145408.GA71410@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20040627154009.GA23021@saltmine.radix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_uKv3AeZJPy/oNUE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 27 June 2004 17:40, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 04:54:08PM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > > diff - 2.7 -> 2.8.1 > > Should be painless (I think) and I dont see why should we keep the old > > version http://www.gnu.org/directory/GNU/diffutils.html > > Newer versions of diff change some of the formatting information, > which can break scripts. Just as newer scripts might break because they assume diff output from the= =20 current version. The interesting question would be if this is considered a= =20 bug by the GNU diff developers. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_uKv3AeZJPy/oNUE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBA3vKuXhc68WspdLARAihiAJ94ATQ6xvpqyj0cw0IYTw9+kvF4PwCeNyHx XlxgAVMedZITAw+YeJUOFqo= =yfjB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_uKv3AeZJPy/oNUE--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406271815.42697.michaelnottebrock>