Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:45:58 +0100
From:      Michael Landin Hostbaek <mich@freebsd.org>
To:        Jeremy Chadwick <jdc@koitsu.org>
Cc:        Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Core Dump / panic sleeping thread
Message-ID:  <0A794600-0D7C-4982-9665-1C39FEFCF8C1@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130319173530.GA72669@icarus.home.lan>
References:  <A6D4A877-2DBA-4E9D-996D-2E34834BF60E@freebsd.org> <20130319173530.GA72669@icarus.home.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mar 19, 2013, at 6:35 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <jdc@koitsu.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:18:06PM +0100, Michael Landin Hostbaek =
wrote:
> The kernel panic is happening in NFS-related code.  Rick Macklem =
(and/or
> John Baldwin) should be able to help with this; I've CC'd both here.

OK, thanks.=20


>=20
> You're going to need to provide the following details:
>=20
> 1. Contents of /etc/rc.conf

sshd_enable=3D"YES"
ntpdate_enable=3D"YES"
ntpdate_hosts=3D"xx.xx.xx.xx"
fsck_y_enable=3D"YES"
named_enable=3D"YES"
dumpdev=3D"AUTO"
nfs_client_enable=3D"YES"
rpc_lockd_enable=3D"YES"
rpc_statd_enable=3D"YES"
ifconfig_em0=3D"inet xx.xx.xx.xx netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast =
xx.xx.xx.xx"
defaultrouter=3D"xx.xx.xx.xx"
hostname=3D"xxxxxxxx"
cloned_interfaces=3D"vlanXXXX"
ifconfig_vlanXXXX=3D"inet xx.xx.xx.xx netmask 255.240.0.0 broadcast =
xx.xx.xx.xx vlan XXXX vlandev em0"
apache22_enable=3D"YES"
pureftpd_enable=3D"YES"
revealcloud_enable=3DYES


> 2. Contents of /etc/sysctl.conf (if modified)

vm.pmap.shpgperproc=3D250

> 3. Contents of /etc/fstab

# Device                Mountpoint      FStype  Options         Dump    =
Pass#
/dev/mirror/gm0s1a		/		ufs		rw	=
1	1
/dev/mirror/gm0s1b		none		swap		sw	=
0	0
/dev/mirror/gm0s1d		/var		ufs		rw	=
2	2
/dev/mirror/gm0s1e		/logs		ufs		rw	=
2	2
/dev/mirror/gm0s1f		/extra		ufs		rw	=
2	2
/dev/mirror/gm0s1g		/usr		ufs		rw	=
2	2
proc                    /proc           procfs  rw              0       =
0
xx.xx.xx.xx:/zpool-000xxx/www	/mnt/www	nfs		rw	=
0	0
xx.xx.xx.xx:/zpool-000xxx/data	/mnt/data	nfs		rw,tcp	=
0	0
linproc			/compat/linux/proc	linprocfs	rw	=
0	0


> 4. ifconfig -a

em0: flags=3D8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu =
1500
	=
options=3D4219b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,WOL=
_MAGIC,VLAN_HWTSO>
	ether 00:25:90:79:a5:ac
	inet xx.xx.xx.xx netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast xx.xx.xx.xx
	inet6 xxxxxx::a5ac%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1=20
	nd6 options=3D29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
	status: active
em1: flags=3D8c02<BROADCAST,OACTIVE,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	=
options=3D4219b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,WOL=
_MAGIC,VLAN_HWTSO>
	ether 00:25:90:79:a5:ad
	nd6 options=3D29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
	media: Ethernet autoselect
	status: no carrier
lo0: flags=3D8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384
	options=3D600003<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
	inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128=20
	inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xb=20
	inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000=20
	nd6 options=3D21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
vlanXXXX: flags=3D8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 =
mtu 1500
	options=3D103<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,TSO4>
	ether 00:25:90:79:a5:ac
	inet xx.xx.xx.xx netmask 0xfff00000 broadcast xx.xx.xx.xx
	inet6 xxxxx:::5ac%vlanXXXX prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xc=20
	nd6 options=3D29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
	status: active
	vlan: XXXX parent interface: em0


> 5. OS used by the NFS server, and all configuration details pertaining
> to that system

This is a hosted service, so I do not have access to this - though I =
believe this is a ZFS fs.
Here's more info about the product: http://help.ovh.co.uk/Nas


>=20
> You may also be asked to upgrade to 9.1-STABLE, as there may be fixes
> for whatever this is in base/stable/9 that are not in -RELEASE, but =
this
> is speculative on my part.

That is not a problem. I would simply like to confirm the issue, before =
upgrading.=20


Thanks,=20

/mich





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0A794600-0D7C-4982-9665-1C39FEFCF8C1>