Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 11:40:46 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: Steve Wingate <steve@velosystems.net> Cc: FreeBSD-questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Why is TCP wrappers in ports? Message-ID: <20020707104046.GC20900@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> In-Reply-To: <20020706222028.4bc8271d.steve@velosystems.net> References: <20020706222028.4bc8271d.steve@velosystems.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 10:20:28PM -0700, Steve Wingate wrote: > Why is tcp wrappers in ports since it's in the base system? It appears > to be the same version. Is there some additional functionality to the > port? History. It's not just tcp wrappers, either. There's quite a few packages that have done their time in the ports tree before being imported into the core system. It also means that, should you be running an older version of FreeBSD without the core version of a package, you can still use it as a port. Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way Tel: +44 1628 476614 Marlow Fax: +44 0870 0522645 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020707104046.GC20900>