Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 23:32:28 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The if_detach problem Message-ID: <199912150632.XAA58638@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 14 Dec 1999 22:50:11 EST." <14423.3759.258444.555708@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> References: <14423.3759.258444.555708@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <imp@village.org> <199912142145.VAA34161@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> <19991214160454.26093@right.PCS>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <14423.3759.258444.555708@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Andrew Gallatin writes:
: s = splnet();
: /*
: * Close down routes etc.
: * This needs to be at splnet
: */
: TAILQ_FOREACH(ifp, &ifnet, if_link){
: if(ifp == &sc->myri_if){
: ifp_valid = 1;
: break;
: }
: }
: if(ifp_valid){
: struct ifaddr *ia = 0;
: struct in_ifaddr *in_ia = 0;
: ifp = &sc->myri_if;
:
: TAILQ_FOREACH(ia, &ifp->if_addrhead, ifa_link){
: if (ia->ifa_addr->sa_family != AF_INET)
: continue;
: in_ia = (struct in_ifaddr *)ia;
: in_ifscrub(ifp, in_ia);
: TAILQ_REMOVE(&in_ifaddrhead, in_ia, ia_link);
: }
: if_detach(&sc->myri_if);
: }
: splx(s);
Any reason not to fold this into if_detach until something more
generic could be developed? I like it better than the current
solution chceked in recently...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912150632.XAA58638>