Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:48:24 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <ml.freebsd.questions@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Ports and 64-bit Processors
Message-ID:  <20080829204754.O5093@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20080829171351.GA72763@slackbox.xs4all.nl>
References:  <10549b080808290744u659d89f9m4c959a968cbe17e1@mail.gmail.com> <20080829171351.GA72763@slackbox.xs4all.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> AFAIK, it is not as much a question of ports being broken, but there are
> some ports that have 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=i386' set, e.g. because they are
> binary-only ports (e.g. flash plugin, nvidia driver) or because they
> contain i386 assembly code or because the code contains assumptions that
> are true on i386 but not on amd64 (like the size of a pointer being
> equal to the size of an integer).

you may just copy binaries onto amd64 system and they will work in 32-bit 
mode.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080829204754.O5093>