Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:39:52 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64/82178: missing 32bit subsystem Message-ID: <20050614133952.GF75048@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20050614071914.GD55703@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200506122320.j5CNKQAF023114@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050613021258.GA5242@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050613071337.GA25893@ip.net.ua> <200506131122.28463.peter@wemm.org> <20050613192423.GC4323@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050613212626.GC6385@ip.net.ua> <20050614071914.GD55703@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Zrag5V6pnZGjLKiw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 12:19:14AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 12:26:26AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 12:24:23PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:22:28AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > > > > On Monday 13 June 2005 12:13 am, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 07:12:58PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > > > There is a known issue that there are some missing bits in the = 5.4 > > > > > > src/release/Makefile such that the 'base' tarball doesn't conta= in > > > > > > the 32-bit ld.so and 32-bit shared libs. > > > > > > > > > > This should be fixed in Makefile.inc1, not in release/Makefile. > > > >=20 > > > > That looks a step in the right direction, but I wonder if we can ha= ve=20 > > > > this stuff in a seperate sysinstall-selectable distribution instead= of=20 > > > > the base dist? > > >=20 > > > Agreed, it would be nice to have more granularity in our install bits. > > > =20 > > OK, I will do it (modulo the sysinstall part). >=20 > I can do that part if you like. Just send the patch that will create the > 32compat/ directory and splited 32compat.XY files. >=20 > Is 32compat or 32bit a suitable name, or do we want a different one? > "compat32" may be confused with FreeBSD-3.2 compatibility libs. > =20 I've choosen a more natural "lib32". You should have the patch in your mailbox now. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --Zrag5V6pnZGjLKiw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCrt4oqRfpzJluFF4RAjVJAJ4kkdgYmcanYjkIR4EsL78kuvNkmQCcD5u6 nr1ACZv739HdM604lbbYW/s= =tt8x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Zrag5V6pnZGjLKiw--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050614133952.GF75048>