From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Jul 24 10:24:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0838B151CB for ; Sat, 24 Jul 1999 10:24:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id CAA12874; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 02:23:51 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3799EA01.4A1E60C@newsguy.com> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 01:29:53 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Summoner Cc: John Armstrong , freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What to tell to Linux-centric people?! References: <37991278.5324A70B@uswest.net> <379914D5.6DB65A6C@uswest.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Summoner wrote: > > John Armstrong wrote: > > Moral of the story, if something goes wrong with your root login > > shell your in a little trouble and much less is likely to happen to > > sh then to tcsh or bash or any other port shell. > > Why would sh be less likely to get screwed up? Because it's hardly > ever used? Hardly ever used?!?!??!?! FOTCROTFLOLMAO!!!!!!!!!! Either sh or csh, because these are linked static and available on /bin, so they can be used in single-user mode. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Your usefulness to my realm ended the day you made it off Hustaing alive." -- Sun Tzu Liao to his ex-finacee, Isis Marik To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message