From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 21:53:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBBAD7D for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52346981 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:53:31 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=YKIdOG6x c=1 sm=0 a=sCkZyOwU0IjLO1BAXY68/A==:17 a=d8Isu0L9vBEA:10 a=ZrqZzSrQiogA:10 a=YNqtyO0l_hcA:10 a=LaogzpLLAAAA:8 a=CqN0Xa_Ne8wA:10 a=BCZJ3XGa9iN6QQibAKIA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=RNU3s1wuz065lYDb:21 a=ChWfih-8Jx05fFTa:21 a=B-X5g-zTAAAA:8 a=Glztyuv-Os6YTJZVjKoA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=Y83UZZ6Wq9TEBMyS:21 a=sCkZyOwU0IjLO1BAXY68/A==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=anat; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 173.63.211.146 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [173.63.211.146] ([173.63.211.146:24581] helo=[192.168.1.8]) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPA id 47/E1-28101-9D545215; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:53:29 -0500 Message-ID: <512545D9.4060401@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:53:29 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130209 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <20130220204108.GA55280@server.rulingia.com> In-Reply-To: <20130220204108.GA55280@server.rulingia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, "office@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:53:31 -0000 20.02.2013 15:41, Peter Jeremy ???????(??): > You left out: > 4. Code relies on language features that are not supported by the compiler. > (It's not a bug that gcc 4.2.1 (eg) doesn't suppert C++11) If a compiler does not support a feature, it is supposed to error-out upon encountering it, not generate invalid code. If this was, in fact, the reason for the problem, it would've been a compiler bug. > 5. Code relies on specific compiler features Depending on what you mean by "compiler features" here, this is simply a duplicate of either your own 4 or my 1. > Feel free to answer your own question if it's important to you. No-one > else is particularly interested. Is that why you decided to chime-in? Because you are not "particularly interested"? Maybe, you should've remained outside this lovely discussion, if this was really true? Jung-uk Kim answered my question, though. > > As others have indicated, the toolchain provided in the base system is > intended only for building the base system. This was never true before and it is rather sad, if it were really becoming the truth now. More than likely, though, this is just a cheap excuse. Kind of like: "you did not pay for the code, did you, so don't expect it to work". -mi