Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 22:02:37 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> Cc: dennis <dennis@etinc.com>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting PPP netmask! HOW! Message-ID: <E0vNAzd-0005ot-00@rover.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 12 Nov 1996 15:20:58 %2B1100." <Pine.BSF.3.91.961112151910.1559F-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> References: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961112151910.1559F-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.91.961112151910.1559F-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> "Daniel O'Callaghan" writes: : True, but sliplogin or slattach or gated (something, I can't remember : which) *does* apply the interface netmask to decide which hosts are : gatewayed by the remote end. Probably just some fudging, as you say. We use gated here to keep sane routes. We'd give it up in about 2 seconds if something better were to come along, however. It is a pain in the butt to setup. About 1/2 the time in getting a slip/ppp connection going in the village is fighting modems. The other half is gated config file problems :-(. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0vNAzd-0005ot-00>