From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 05:24:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA43F16A4CE for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 05:24:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thingy.tbd.co.nz (thingy.tbd.co.nz [210.48.70.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D3343D2D for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 05:24:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@fud.org.nz) Received: from thingy.tbd.co.nz (localhost [127.0.0.1])iBJ5TLAX003003 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:29:21 +1300 Received: (from thompsa@localhost) by thingy.tbd.co.nz (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id iBJ5TKva003000 for stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:29:20 +1300 Resent-Message-Id: <200412190529.iBJ5TKva003000@thingy.tbd.co.nz> X-Authentication-Warning: thingy.tbd.co.nz: thompsa set sender to andy@fud.org.nz using -f Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:28:39 +1300 From: Andrew Thompson To: Brett Glass Message-ID: <20041219052839.GA31776@thingy.tbd.co.nz> References: <200412190500.WAA16814@lariat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200412190500.WAA16814@lariat.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Resent-From: andy@fud.org.nz Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:29:20 +1300 Resent-To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will there be a 5.3.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 05:24:38 -0000 On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 10:00:57PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote: > I see that there is no scheduled release date for FreeBSD 5.4 > (which is not a surprise; 5.3 was finalized so recently). > However, there seem to be glitches and performance issues > which I need to see resolved before I can move to 5.3.x (rather > than 4.10 or 4.11) for production servers. > > Would anyone else besides me like to see a 5.3.1 minor release > sometime around, say, February? > Why not just track RELENG_5? It would give you the same thing. Andrew