Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:45:37 -0700
From:      Alfred Perlstein <alfred@ixsystems.com>
To:        Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com>
Cc:        "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org>, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, "nonesuch@longcount.org" <nonesuch@longcount.org>
Subject:   Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2
Message-ID:  <521259C1.8010807@ixsystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKYr3zwdm-6tx3HsT73_mXRM_E=XBfpGtoayd1TeBNQKC_oWLg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <51D90B9B.9080209@ixsystems.com> <51D92826.1070707@freebsd.org> <51D9B24B.8070303@ixsystems.com> <51DACE93.9050608@freebsd.org> <520DC77C.1070003@ixsystems.com> <520DE306.4080004@freebsd.org> <5211EAD0.1060404@freebsd.org> <19B7F957-EF1D-4452-986A-3F4C51CA647E@ixsystems.com> <CAKYr3zxeOCssSq3mouz%2BNWC5-vvAReP2oueU8bFFgFhrmi-dzQ@mail.gmail.com> <60A37C45-B4BA-4F25-8A43-F09FE0A44453@ixsystems.com> <CAKYr3zxFe8MPkZusxPsZLDcraGNFC1TSaXvXRVw=1XY69_5Ojg@mail.gmail.com> <52124502.3050405@freebsd.org> <CAKYr3zwdm-6tx3HsT73_mXRM_E=XBfpGtoayd1TeBNQKC_oWLg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/19/13 9:19 AM, Outback Dingo wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org 
> <mailto:andre@freebsd.org>> wrote:
>
>     On 19.08.2013 18:09, Outback Dingo wrote:
>
>
>
>
>         On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Alfred Perlstein
>         <alfred@ixsystems.com <mailto:alfred@ixsystems.com>
>         <mailto:alfred@ixsystems.com <mailto:alfred@ixsystems.com>>>
>         wrote:
>
>             Performance is bad for large memory requirements period.
>
>             Vnodes and mbufs on a machine with 24gb ram is limited to
>         the same amount as a machine with less
>             than 4GB ram.
>
>             This was fixed in head but not merged back in time.
>
>
>         is there a patch set i can backport on my own, do we know what
>         revision(s) are required? Ive got
>         boxes with
>         128GB and 10Gbe Intel....... so im willing to do some work......
>
>
>     I have committed it to 9-stable this morning with r254515.  No
>     backporting necessary.
>
>
> Okay so wait, your saying the autotune commit this morning resolves 
> Alfreds claims of abysmal
> performance in general,

Yes.
> or is there other additional fixes in head aside from the autotune hes 
> mentioning

Well of course head has cool code, but this was a big problem.

-Alfred



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?521259C1.8010807>