Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:25:00 -0600 From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: morten@hotpost.dk Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs OpenBSD Message-ID: <15034.2876.610732.775833@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <77056640@toto.iv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
morten@hotpost.dk types: > The cacophony of voices in my head > Inform me that Nikolay N. Semenov said: > > Hello, > > > > Just tried to compare that UNIX clones > > but still unaware of their real differences > > except that OpenBSD is more security-oriented. > OpenBSD is a more "full" UNIX, it has OpenSSH, sudo kerberos and such > installed in the base system. FreeBSD includes OpenSSH these days. It didn't include it before because of the different laws on exporting crypto tech in the US and Canada. OpenBSD has the more up to date version, as OpenSSH is developed on OpenBSD, and has to go through the contrib software path for FreeBSD. <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15034.2876.610732.775833>