Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:40:01 +0100 (MET) From: Jean-Marc Zucconi <jmz@FreeBSD.org> To: asami@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: comments on XFree86-4 port Message-ID: <200003131740.SAA00771@qix.jmz.org> In-Reply-To: <vqcya7nchv4.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> (asami@FreeBSD.org) References: <200003120957.BAA98663@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <200003121731.SAA94506@qix.jmz.org> <vqcya7nchv4.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> Satoshi writes: > By the way, I noticed you put ".if defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING) > IS_INTERACTIVE=no" and thought "yay, Jean-Marc finally made the > configure script not ask questions when PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined!", > so I commented out the "IS_INTERACTIVE=no" (it's a boolean set/not-set > variable, so setting it to "no" is equivalent to "yes") line, but it > still asks me questions. What's up with this? ;) I have to say that I never test the port with PACKAGE_BUILDING=yes... But I am only 1/2 guilty because I am not the author of this: Brian Fundakowski Feldman sent me patches some time ago, telling me ``It just worked for me'' :-} Jean-Marc -- Jean-Marc Zucconi PGP Key: finger jmz@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003131740.SAA00771>