From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Mar 13 9:38:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from FreeBSD.org (hibou.obs-besancon.fr [193.52.184.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37FE37BDB5; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 09:38:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmz@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from jmz@localhost) by qix.jmz.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA00771; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:40:01 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from jmz@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:40:01 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200003131740.SAA00771@qix.jmz.org> From: Jean-Marc Zucconi To: asami@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: (asami@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: comments on XFree86-4 port X-Mailer: Emacs References: <200003120957.BAA98663@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <200003121731.SAA94506@qix.jmz.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >>>>> Satoshi writes: > By the way, I noticed you put ".if defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING) > IS_INTERACTIVE=no" and thought "yay, Jean-Marc finally made the > configure script not ask questions when PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined!", > so I commented out the "IS_INTERACTIVE=no" (it's a boolean set/not-set > variable, so setting it to "no" is equivalent to "yes") line, but it > still asks me questions. What's up with this? ;) I have to say that I never test the port with PACKAGE_BUILDING=yes... But I am only 1/2 guilty because I am not the author of this: Brian Fundakowski Feldman sent me patches some time ago, telling me ``It just worked for me'' :-} Jean-Marc -- Jean-Marc Zucconi PGP Key: finger jmz@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message