From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jan 24 00:43:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA20536 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 24 Jan 1998 00:43:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA20528 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 1998 00:43:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id XAA12444; Fri, 23 Jan 1998 23:40:54 -0800 (PST) To: Brian Tao cc: "Lee Crites (AEI)" , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Had the shotgun out and pointed at my -current/SMP box... In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 24 Jan 1998 00:34:26 EST." Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 23:40:53 -0800 Message-ID: <12440.885627653@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > that could comfortably handle ~100 users. With today's CPU's and the > price of memory, it's too bad we can only get 256 pty's per machine. > I'll bet a nice Pentium II system could handle 500 shell users. Yeah, if only someone (sigh) would take up that cloning PTY driver project, such arbitrary limits would be unnecessary. [he gazes wistfully off into the distance :-)] Jordan